Evaluation · Metrics

AI Memory Metrics: Accuracy, Latency and Cost

The metrics that matter for agent memory are recall accuracy, retrieval latency and token/storage cost — track all three because optimizing one in isolation misleads.

Three pillars

Accuracy
Latency
$
Cost

Accuracy

Recall and accuracy metrics

Recall@k, probe accuracy and benchmark alignment — LOCOMO and LongMemEval as standard evals.

  • Recall@k — fraction of relevant memories in top-k retrieval results
  • Probe accuracy — can the agent answer questions requiring stored facts?
  • LOCOMO J score — Mem0 66.9, Zep 66.0, LangMem 58.1 (Chhikara et al., 2025 eval)
  • LongMemEval — Zep +18.5% vs baseline with gpt-4o at 71.2% (Rasmussen et al., 2025)

Production: maintain golden Q/A sets per domain; run eval in CI on each deploy.

LOCOMO benchmark · LongMemEval

Latency

Latency metrics

p50/p99 retrieval latency, end-to-end turn latency and embedding time.

Mem0 on LOCOMO: median search 0.148 s, p95 total 1.44 s vs 17.1 s full-context (Chhikara et al., 2025). Support bots often target sub-200 ms retrieval p99.

Customer support use case

Cost

Cost metrics

Tokens per turn, embedding API cost, storage GB and managed API pricing.

  • Tokens per query — Mem0 ~1,800 vs ~26,000 full-context (Chhikara et al., 2025)
  • Embedding cost — per-write API calls at scale
  • Storage GB — vector dimensions × memory count
  • Managed API — per-call pricing vs self-host infra

Reduce token cost with memory

Observability

Observability stack

Log every write and retrieval; alert on recall@k drops; trace IDs per conversation.

  • Log injected memories per turn (context engineering audit)
  • Dashboard: recall@k, latency p50/p99, tokens per query, store size
  • Alert when recall@k drops below threshold vs CI baseline
  • Gate deploys on LOCOMO regression in staging

Memory management

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

What is the most important agent memory metric?

Recall accuracy (can the agent retrieve the right facts?) — but track latency and cost together. Optimizing tokens alone can tank recall@k.

Benchmark metrics vs production metrics?

LOCOMO/LongMemEval for CI gates. Production golden Q/A sets for domain-specific recall. Run both — benchmarks don't cover your CRM schema.

What latency SLA for agent memory retrieval?

Support bots often target sub-200 ms p99 retrieval. Mem0 median search 0.148 s on LOCOMO (Chhikara et al., 2025).

How do you benchmark memory cost?

Track tokens per query before/after memory adoption. Mem0 ~1,800 vs ~26,000 tokens per LOCOMO query (Chhikara et al., 2025).

What metrics does Mem0 report?

LOCOMO J 66.9, median search 0.148 s, p95 total 1.44 s, ~1,800 vs ~26,000 tokens (Chhikara et al., 2025).

What metrics does Engram report?

N/A for LOCOMO/LongMemEval publicly as of July 2026. Track recall@k, retrieval latency and token injection on your Weaviate deployment. See Engram explained.